Friday, September 20, 2024

मेधा पाटकर की पांच महीने की सजा पर आपत्ति जताई, कहा कानूनी रूप से विचारणीय नहीं है

New Delhi , Latest Updated On - Sep 05 2024 | 11:29:00 AM

दिल्ली के उपराज्यपाल वी के सक्सेना ने बुधवार को नर्मदा बचाओ आंदोलन की नेता मेधा पाटकर की पांच महीने की सजा के खिलाफ दायर अपील पर अपना जवाब दाखिल करते हुए कहा कि अपील कानूनी रूप से विचारणीय नहीं है और खारिज किए जाने योग्य है। साकेत कोर्ट के अतिरिक्त सत्र न्यायाधीश विशाल सिंह ने 23 साल पहले गुजरात में एक एनजीओ का नेतृत्व करने वाले सक्सेना द्वारा दायर मानहानि के मामले में 29 जुलाई को पाटकर की सजा को निलंबित कर दिया था और उनसे जवाब मांगा था। 1 जुलाई को मजिस्ट्रेट अदालत ने पाटकर को पांच महीने के साधारण कारावास की सजा सुनाई थी, इसके अलावा 10 लाख रुपये का जुर्माना भी लगाया था। बुधवार को सक्सेना के वकील गजिंदर कुमार और किरण जय ने पाटकर की अपील पर आपत्ति जताते हुए कहा कि यह विचारणीय नहीं है और खारिज किए जाने योग्य है क्योंकि पाटकर ने इस पर हस्ताक्षर नहीं किए हैं।



Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena on Wednesday filed his reply on the appeal filed by Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Patkar against her five-month sentence, saying the appeal is not legally maintainable and deserves to be dismissed. Additional Sessions Judge Vishal Singh of Saket Court had suspended Patkar's sentence on July 29 in a defamation case filed by Saxena, who headed an NGO in Gujarat 23 years ago, and sought her response. On July 1, the magistrate court had sentenced Patkar to five months' simple imprisonment, besides imposing a fine of Rs 10 lakh. On Wednesday, Saxena's lawyers Gajinder Kumar and Kiran Jai objected to Patkar's appeal, saying it is not maintainable and deserves to be dismissed as Patkar has not signed it.

Further, he had filed a “false affidavit” which was “ante-dated” or signed and verified on July 17, a date on which the appeal did not exist, the advocates said, adding, for these reasons, there were “grave doubts” about the “truth and veracity” of the contents of the appeal. According to Saxena’s reply, “This manner of filing the appeal i.e. without the signature of the accused or appellant (Patkar) and with an antedated false affidavit is not only an act of contempt and perjury of this court but it is also a clever strategy on the part of the appellant to deny any or the entire facts and record as per his convenience.”

COMMENTS
All Comments (11)
  • V
    vijaykumar
    vijaykumar@pearlorganisation.com
    25/12/2023
    Lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Earum autem perferendis ad libero at cumque ipsa labore consequatur inventore eaque
    A
    arif
    arif@pearlorganisation.com
    25/12/2023
    Lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Earum autem perferendis ad libero at cumque ipsa labore consequatur inventore eaque
    A
    ajaykumar
    ajaykumar@pearlorganisation.com
    25/12/2023
    Lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Earum autem perferendis ad libero at cumque ipsa labore consequatur inventore eaque
    H
    harshit
    harshit@pearlorganisation.com
    25/12/2023
    very intresting news
    A
    ankitankit
    ankitankit@pearlorganisation.com
    27/12/2023
    Good
    H
    harshit
    harshit@pearlorganisation.com
    29/12/2023
    good news
    R
    rahul+11
    rahul+11@pearlorganisation.com
    15/01/2024
    Nice
    R
    rahul+11
    rahul+11@pearlorganisation.com
    15/01/2024
    Bisarkh police station, during checking at Char Murti intersection, spotted an FZ MOSA carrying two persons towards Surajpur.
    R
    rahul
    rahul@pearlorganisation.com
    02/02/2024
    test
    H
    harshit
    harshit@pearlorganisation.com
    02/02/2024
    अच्छा
    R
    rahul
    rahul@pearlorganisation.com
    08/02/2024
    अच्छा